{"id":293,"date":"2010-04-18T19:25:13","date_gmt":"2010-04-18T18:25:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/?p=293"},"modified":"2010-04-18T19:25:13","modified_gmt":"2010-04-18T18:25:13","slug":"the-x-axis-18-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/?p=293","title":{"rendered":"The X-Axis &#8211; 18 April 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s Sunday afternoon, it&#8217;s time to review some comics!<\/p>\n<p>But first&#8230; you&#8217;ll also be wanting to download this week&#8217;s episode of <em>House to Astonish<\/em>, which you&#8217;ll find in the next post down.\u00a0 In this one, Al and I talk about <em>Brightest Day<\/em>, <em>Kill Shakespeare<\/em> and <em>Turf<\/em>.\u00a0 And for those of you who don&#8217;t listen all the way to the end, keep an eye out over the next few days when Al and I appear on the next episode of <a href=\"http:\/\/thethumbcast.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Thumbcast<\/a>.\u00a0 We&#8217;re doing a panel game based on the BBC radio show <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/programmes\/b0070hvs\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Fighting Talk<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0 (Only not about sport, obviously.)\u00a0 Should be fun.\u00a0 We&#8217;re recording it on Tuesday, so we&#8217;ll let you know when it&#8217;s up.\u00a0 Or you could just subscribe to their podcast too.\u00a0 I do.<\/p>\n<p>Next week&#8230; well, god knows, really.\u00a0 Theoretically there&#8217;s a whole lot of comics out (including two chapters of &#8220;Second Coming&#8221;, just to prove that Marvel really are the worst schedulers imaginable), but given that Diamond are usually unable to get their heads round a bank holiday, I don&#8217;t see them overcoming a volcanic dust cloud.\u00a0 So it may be an involuntary skip week next Sunday.\u00a0 Time will tell.<\/p>\n<p>And now, some comics that came out this last week&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Black Widow<\/strong><\/em><strong> #1<\/strong> &#8211; Just to prove that Marvel are nothing if not eternally optimistic, this is a new ongoing series for the perennial C-lister, presumably on the basis that she&#8217;s in the upcoming Iron Man movie.\u00a0 Anyone seriously think that&#8217;s going to help it get past the year barrier?\u00a0 No, me neither.\u00a0 You know, if it were me, I&#8217;d take the &#8220;series of miniseries&#8221; route with these lower-tier characters.\u00a0 It&#8217;s a vicious circle when you start cancelling books after five months, because then readers have even less faith in the next launch (and they&#8217;re right to do so).\u00a0 Seems to me that if you call it a mini then you&#8217;re probably going to turn out to be right anyway, and you&#8217;ll restore some of the lustre of launching something as an Ongoing Series.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, the comic.\u00a0 It&#8217;s by Marjorie Liu and Daniel Acuna, a decent creative team.\u00a0 Despite the silly acres of cleavage on the cover, the interior art has no truck with such nonsense, which is reassuring.\u00a0 It&#8217;s one of those stories where Natasha is attacked by baddies with a Mysterious Agenda, who cut something out of her and then leave her for the doctors to deal with.\u00a0 And&#8230; actually that&#8217;s about the extent of the main plot, but Liu fills it out nicely with good supporting roles for the other Avengers (higher-profile characters who nonetheless don&#8217;t overshadow her), some neat interactions between Natasha and the other spy types, and a genuinely nasty, if rather implausible, surgery sequence.\u00a0 Acuna&#8217;s art is a good match for the character, who goes well with slightly stylised visuals.\u00a0 And it strikes a decent balance between using other Marvel Universe characters (to appeal to the Wednesday crowd) without letting them dominate the story (and thus alienating all those movie viewers who are theoretically supposed to be buying the book).\u00a0 All told, it&#8217;s pretty good.\u00a0 And even if it doesn&#8217;t survive for long as an ongoing series, I think it&#8217;ll manage to deliver an entertaining few issues with this story.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Brightest Day<\/strong><\/em><strong> #0<\/strong> &#8211; See also the podcast.\u00a0 This is the opening issue of DC&#8217;s next universe-spanning thingy, running fortnightly for the next few months.\u00a0 A bunch of characters were brought back from the dead at the end of <em>Blackest Night<\/em>; this series is, well, about them.\u00a0 So it&#8217;s an ensemble cast, except the characters have seemingly nothing in common other than being brought back from the dead &#8211; it&#8217;s a motley crew ranging from the likes of the Martian Manhunter and Maxwell Lord down to Captain Boomerang and Hawk.\u00a0 I can sort of see why they&#8217;ve billed this as issue #0 &#8211; it&#8217;s really about introducing the vast set of characters rather than kicking off the story proper &#8211; but it is essential reading and to all intents and purposes it&#8217;s issue #1.\u00a0 Much depends here on whether Geoff Johns and Peter Tomasi ultimately have a good explanation for reviving this oddball selection of characters, since that&#8217;s the central mystery that has to drive this series.\u00a0 Without that, it risks becoming an exercise in reversing unwanted continuity.\u00a0 There&#8217;s also another possibility, which is that the series manages to do something interesting with the whole concept of how the different characters deal with their reincarnation, but that doesn&#8217;t exactly seem to be a priority here.\u00a0 Fernando Pasarin&#8217;s art is lovely, and I thought this was basically fine as an intro issue.\u00a0 Al wasn&#8217;t so sure, to put it mildly.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The Flash<\/strong><\/em><strong> #1<\/strong> &#8211; What, <em>another<\/em> Flash relaunch?\u00a0 Do you think they&#8217;ll ever take the hint and put the poor guy on the back burner for a while to let interest build?\u00a0 Probably not, unfortunately; it&#8217;s alien to DC&#8217;s entire way of thinking about their older characters.\u00a0 So, here&#8217;s Geoff Johns and Francis Manapul to kick off another stab at breathing life back into the franchise.\u00a0 Barry Allen returns to Central City (where everyone apparently thinks he&#8217;s been in witness protection or something), and picks up his old job as a forensic scientist.\u00a0 Which, yes, is backwards&#8230; but it&#8217;s also a useful dual identity for plot purposes, so I&#8217;ve got no real problems with that.\u00a0 And we&#8217;re also back to the old deal where everyone thinks Barry is gifted but incredibly slow, when of course we all know he&#8217;s&#8230; and so on and so forth.\u00a0 All told, even as someone who&#8217;s not particularly familiar with the character&#8217;s history, it&#8217;s pretty clear that this is a case of a creative team hammering the reset button as hard as they can and hauling the character back to what they regard as a classic status quo.\u00a0 The concession to the passage of time is that Central City has become darker and more disillusioned in Barry&#8217;s absence &#8211; <em>DO YOU SEE THE SUBTLE METAPHOR?<\/em> &#8211; and so presumably he&#8217;s going to be setting the world to rights a bit.\u00a0 But okay, I guess. If you&#8217;re going to do the Silver Age throwback routine with anyone, the Flash is a fair choice &#8211; his powers lend himself to that sort of story, and he ought to be a shiny, happy hero of the old school.\u00a0 I like the art; Manapul&#8217;s got a simple but expressive quality to his work, though it&#8217;s unfortunate that he&#8217;s chosen to interpret Barry as a square-jawed hero so traditional that, when he&#8217;s not in costume, he&#8217;s the least interesting thing on the page.\u00a0 As for the story&#8230; well, it&#8217;s throwback city, like I say.\u00a0 But that seems to be the mood of the industry right now, and to be honest, I don&#8217;t have enough investment in any later incarnation of the Flash to have a problem with Johns doing it in this book.\u00a0 For what it is, which is a very old-fashioned superhero book with a slightly modernised sheen, it works quite well.\u00a0 Whether that&#8217;s what you want is another matter.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Kill Shakespeare<\/strong><\/em><strong> #1<\/strong> &#8211; A miniseries written by Conor McCreery and Anthony Del Col with art by Andy Belanger, in which a bunch of Shakespeare villains try to enlist Hamlet to, well, kill Shakespeare.\u00a0 This has had some mixed reviews.\u00a0 Al and I didn&#8217;t mind it; those who knows their Shakespeare say it&#8217;s missing the point of the characters.\u00a0 But is it?\u00a0 It&#8217;s hard to say; after all, the story has a couple of characters departing from the plot of <em>Hamlet<\/em> completely unprompted, so perhaps they&#8217;re not meant to act quite like the characters from the plays.\u00a0 As I mentioned on the podcast, I have a theory that the characters who want to get rid of Shakespeare are united in being villains from the histories who weren&#8217;t actually quite so villainous in real life &#8211; Shakespeare had a tendency to take the politically safe option when it came to writing about historical figures who had gone out of favour.\u00a0 A clearer problem is that the characters are decidedly two-dimensional compared to Shakespeare&#8217;s versions &#8211; though when you&#8217;re inviting comparisons to <em>Hamlet<\/em>, you&#8217;re setting the bar ridiculously high to start with.\u00a0 It&#8217;s basically <em>League of Extraordinary Gentlemen<\/em> with Shakespeare characters, though maybe not with the subtlety.\u00a0 And as with Moore&#8217;s comic, the question lurking in the background is whether this is just a gimmicky idea, or whether there&#8217;s actually a point to be made about the plays.\u00a0 It&#8217;s really too early to tell at this point; it could go either way.\u00a0 Certainly a flawed comic, but for all that, I&#8217;m genuinely intrigued to see where the creators are going with this odd premise.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>New Mutants<\/strong><\/em><strong> #12<\/strong> &#8211; Part 3 of the &#8220;Second Coming&#8221; crossover, and you guessed it, there&#8217;s more fighting.\u00a0 In fairness, to preserve the idea that this is indeed an issue of <em>New Mutants<\/em>, the focus is on Cannonball and the others trying to hold off the Right and stop them from providing reinforcements to the other baddies.\u00a0 And of course, that&#8217;s not the focal point of the overall story by any means.\u00a0 But it does at least provide the New Mutants with a story of their own, instead of getting them submerged into the bigger picture.\u00a0 Basically, though, there are still two threads here: everyone chasing after Cable and Hope, and the X-Men starting to realise that some of Scott&#8217;s decisions are a bit questionable.\u00a0 It&#8217;s not a bad issue &#8211; there are some good moments with the New Mutants wavering about whether to obey Scott&#8217;s seemingly suicidal attack orders, and a couple of cute ideas such as the bad guys taking out Magik with a &#8220;weaponised ritual&#8221;.\u00a0 And Ibrahim Roberson&#8217;s artwork is pretty good, though his backgrounds are rather generic.\u00a0 The downside is that the story seems to have become completely detached from the real world, so that it&#8217;s all about people in costumes hitting one another; and it feels at this point like a diversion grafted on to the &#8220;Second Coming&#8221; story in order to shoehorn <em>New Mutants<\/em> into the plot and give it a sales boost.\u00a0 Zeb Wells has written better issues than this, but hey, that&#8217;s crossovers for you.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The Pilgrim<\/strong><\/em><strong> #1<\/strong> &#8211; This is by Mark Ryan and Mike Grell, and apparently it&#8217;s a reprint of a web comic that I&#8217;ve never read.\u00a0 It&#8217;s a rather frustrating read.\u00a0 The central idea is quite fun: much of the issue introduces the Psimex Research Institute, in which the American military is testing people with psi-powers.\u00a0 The good news is that these subjects actually do have psi-powers &#8211; but not very strong ones.\u00a0 They&#8217;re meant to be an intelligence unit; in practice, they&#8217;re the thought-controllers of paranoid fantasies.\u00a0 Combining that with bureaucratic budget arguments is a nice enough idea.\u00a0 However, it&#8217;s topped and tailed with scenes of weird stuff in World War II and Afghanistan which are hard work to decipher.\u00a0\u00a0 It&#8217;s not even always clear which way your eye should go around double-page spreads.\u00a0 The opening section seems to be intentionally cryptic, but the closing sequence just comes across as a mess.\u00a0 There are some major clarity problems here, and I end up with the feeling that deciphering the story is going to be a major headache and more trouble than it&#8217;s worth.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The Unwritten<\/strong><\/em><strong> #12<\/strong> &#8211; Once again, Mike Carey throws in a single-issue story between arcs.\u00a0 This one has art by Peter Gross, and it&#8217;s fantastic.\u00a0 Pauly Bruckner is a bad, bad man.\u00a0 He tried to take Wilson Taylor&#8217;s map, and ended up being condemned to the world of fiction. Specifically, he&#8217;s now a bunny in Eliza Mae Hertford&#8217;s Willowbank Tales, a sort of halfway house between Winnie the Pooh and Beatrix Potter.\u00a0 And boy, he&#8217;s not happy about that.\u00a0 In this issue, we join Mr Bun as he tries to escape life as a stuffed rabbit, while the other woodland folk try their best to help him fit in.\u00a0 It&#8217;s a simple idea, it&#8217;s very funny, and it&#8217;s got a clever pay-off to boot.\u00a0 Easily the best comic I&#8217;ve read in weeks, and worth picking up even if you have no interest in the wider series at all.\u00a0 Simply excellent.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>X-Factor Forever<\/strong><\/em><strong> #2<\/strong> &#8211; &#8220;For six years, writer Louise Simonson steered the course for Charles Xavier&#8217;s first class of X-Men in their adventures as X-Factor.\u00a0 Now the legendary scribe returns to the mutants she made famous for their most daring adventure yet.&#8221;\u00a0 Marvel Comics: never knowingly underhyped.<\/p>\n<p>Now, that said, I liked Louise Simonson&#8217;s run on <em>X-Factor<\/em>, and for largely nostalgic reasons, I&#8217;m really quite enjoying this book, which harks back to a long-forgotten supporting cast and a long-abandoned interpretation of Apocalypse.\u00a0 I suspect if I didn&#8217;t have that attachment to the source material, I&#8217;d be crawling up the walls at some of this stuff &#8211; it&#8217;s one of those comics where humanoid robots have &#8220;visual input sensors&#8221; instead of &#8220;eyes&#8221;, and where characters stay stuff like &#8220;Apocalypse?\u00a0 Only he could be so diabolical as to combine the Master Mold and Hodge into a single being!&#8221;\u00a0 In other words, it is, in some respects, rather crap.\u00a0 But loveably so, and in an authentically late-eighties way.\u00a0 And in its favour, it&#8217;s got a completely loopy robot for the heroes to fight, and there&#8217;s a jittery energy to Dan Panosian&#8217;s art which I genuinely like a lot.\u00a0 I&#8217;m enjoying it; if you don&#8217;t remember the original, you might not.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>X-Men Forever<\/strong><\/em><strong> #21<\/strong> &#8211; In this issue: a convoluted macguffin is explained!\u00a0 Also, Claremont goes a little further into last issue&#8217;s big revelation that Iron Man is the bad guy.\u00a0 A little disappointingly, he seems to be already setting up the idea that it&#8217;s all a feint and that he&#8217;s infiltrating them, or something to that effect.\u00a0 That&#8217;s a shame, since I quite liked the idea of doing a story in <em>X-Men Forever<\/em> that was manifestly impossible in the real Marvel Universe, by gleefully wrecking the cast of another book.\u00a0 In many ways, Iron Man&#8217;s ideally suited to be the well-intentioned anti-mutant superhero, particularly in his <em>Civil War<\/em>-era version.\u00a0 Anyway, this is largely a set-up issue as everyone sits around delivering exposition to one another, in preparation for the climax of the first year.\u00a0 But it&#8217;s building well enough, and the pay-off should be good fun.\u00a0 A fortnightly book can get away with this sort of issue.\u00a0 (Be honest: is there any book that <em>wouldn&#8217;t<\/em> be improved by a more frequent schedule?)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>X-Men: Pixie Strikes Back<\/strong><\/em><strong> #2<\/strong> &#8211; I actually missed this when it came out, so let&#8217;s cover it now.\u00a0 Issue #1 had a nice enough set-up, but this one just gets a bit confusing &#8211; is Blindfold with the others or not?\u00a0 Are they in a dream or in the real San Francisco?\u00a0 Yes, I realise that we&#8217;re <em>meant<\/em> to be asking ourselves what on earth is going on, but the plot here is so murky that it&#8217;s hard to get a sense of what exactly the drama is supposed to be.\u00a0 I recall having similar issues with Kathryn Immonen&#8217;s <em>Hellcat<\/em> mini.\u00a0 Maybe I&#8217;m just slow.\u00a0 There are some good moments in here, and I really like Sara Pichelli&#8217;s art, which gives the characters a real sense of life, and provides a suitably off-kilter tone to Pixie&#8217;s scenes.\u00a0 As a story, though, I&#8217;m not sure it works.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s Sunday afternoon, it&#8217;s time to review some comics! But first&#8230; you&#8217;ll also be wanting to download this week&#8217;s episode of House to Astonish, which you&#8217;ll find in the next post down.\u00a0 In this one, Al and I talk about Brightest Day, Kill Shakespeare and Turf.\u00a0 And for those of you who don&#8217;t listen all [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-x-axis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=293"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":294,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293\/revisions\/294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}