{"id":602,"date":"2010-11-20T19:04:52","date_gmt":"2010-11-20T19:04:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/?p=602"},"modified":"2010-11-20T19:04:52","modified_gmt":"2010-11-20T19:04:52","slug":"survivor-series-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/?p=602","title":{"rendered":"Survivor Series 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"

The WWE sure is making life easy for me with these columns. \u00a0Once again, we’ve got a card that’s based around one or two core matches, with the rest filled out randomly at the last minute. \u00a0Which means there’s less to say about them.<\/p>\n

Survivor Series<\/em>, in theory, is one of the major shows on the WWE’s pay-per-view calendar, although it long since drifted hopelessly from the original theme of ten-man elimination tag matches. \u00a0It’s ironic that in a period when the WWE has generally been trying to build their shows around gimmick themes, Survivor Series<\/em> has actually been going the other way, even while it holds on to the name as a relic from yesteryear. \u00a0There’s one elimination match on this year’s show, and it’s very much a last-minute affair designed to get the Smackdown crew on the show.<\/p>\n

The other thing to bear in mind about this show is that the WWE have got it into their heads that there’s a proud tradition of doing screwjob finishes in the main event at Survivor Series<\/em>. \u00a0This harks back to the notorious “Montreal screwjob”<\/a> at Survivor Series<\/em> 1997, when the outgoing Bret Hart was genuinely doublecrossed to bring about a result that he wasn’t willing to co-operate in. \u00a0While the WWE seems to have finally stopped banging on about the resulting storyline – which it kept harking back to years after anyone in their right mind had stopped caring – the notion that you get weird double-cross finishes in Survivor Series<\/em> main events seems to have taken root. \u00a0Which is why they’re building this show around a main event whose central selling point is the promise of a ludicrous finish…<\/p>\n

1. \u00a0WWE Title (no-DQ, no count-outs): Randy Orton v. Wade Barrett.<\/strong> So let’s recap. \u00a0Randy Orton is the defending champion, doing a sort of antihero babyface routine that’s starting to settle in but still feels a bit rough around the edges. \u00a0Wade Barrett is the leader of the Nexus rookie faction who’ve dominated Raw’s storylines for much of the year. \u00a0Two months ago, we had John Cena v Wade Barrett with the stipulation that if Cena won, Nexus disbanded, and if Barrett won, Cena joined Nexus. \u00a0Barrett won – by cheating, naturally – and after Raw’s general manager made clear that Cena would not be permitted to renege on the promise, he ended up reluctantly taking orders from Barrett.<\/p>\n

Cena won Barrett a title shot, and last month we had Barrett v Orton for the first time. \u00a0Cena was supposed to interfere to make sure Barrett won the match, but (in a rather confusing finish) he technically complied with that order by getting Orton disqualified. \u00a0That meant Barrett won the match, but Orton retained the title, since championships don’t change hands on a disqualification. \u00a0It also meant that Barrett got an automatic rematch.<\/p>\n

This time, Barrett won the right to choose the referee (yes, the idea of deliberately having a biased referee in a world title match is ludicrous, but that’s professional wrestling for you) and nominated Cena. \u00a0We also have a no-DQ, no count-out stipulation – which basically rules out the possibility of Cena’s engineering another Barrett win where the title doesn’t change hands. \u00a0It also seems to leave the way clear for a Nexus run-in, come to think of it. \u00a0And the deal here is that if Barrett wins, Cena is free from Nexus; if Orton wins, Cena is kicked out of the WWE. \u00a0(Again, don’t ask why the general manager would play along with that, given that Cena’s their single biggest merchandise seller. \u00a0The WWE tends not to think things through in that level of detail.)<\/p>\n

So.<\/p>\n

The match, technically, is Barrett v Orton – which by all accounts was nothing to write home about last month. \u00a0But in practice, what you’re paying for is to find out what Cena does. \u00a0Does he stay true to his babyface principles and call the match down the middle? \u00a0Or does he just screw Orton in order to get himself out of Nexus? \u00a0There’s occasional talk about the possibility of turning Cena heel altogether, but I suspect now isn’t the time – Raw doesn’t have anyone else who can serve the same role of the main hero for the younger audience.<\/p>\n

Despite the gaping logic holes, the storyline hasn’t been bad, mainly due to strong performances by Cena and Barrett (who’s inexperienced as a wrestler but shows potential and has a good screen presence). \u00a0There are, however, some problems with it as a pay-per-view main event.<\/p>\n

Firstly, there is a possible outcome which doesn’t cause Cena any moral dilemma at all: Barrett could win cleanly. \u00a0For the story to work, you’ve got to downplay or discount that possibility, which makes Barrett look like a weak challenger – something that sits awkwardly with his status as leader of a main event heel faction.<\/p>\n

Secondly, the focus is entirely on Cena and Barrett, so that Orton, despite being the champion, ends up as something of a third wheel. \u00a0Only at the last minute did the writers seem to twig to the only logical course of action open to Orton in this situation: destroy Cena so that he has to be replaced as referee. \u00a0Look for Orton to try that in the opening seconds – and quite possibly succeed, so that they can have some sort of actual match before getting to the storyline.<\/p>\n

Thirdly, they seem to have written themselves into a corner. \u00a0They’ve hammered home the idea that Barrett’s bound to win, and it defies belief that they could actually get rid of Cena – though they might try it for a short period, I suppose. \u00a0Point is, they’ve made it seem something of a foregone conclusion, which doesn’t really serve the drama.<\/p>\n

And on top of all that, it’s very difficult to have a good match when everyone knows it can’t end until something plainly illegal takes place. \u00a0It makes it incredibly hard to sucker the crowd into reacting to near falls, for example. \u00a0Given that Orton\/Barrett wasn’t that great last time round, I have to admit that while I’m vaguely curious to find out what they’re going to do here, I’m not particularly desperate to actually watch it<\/em>. \u00a0And that’s the thing – the draw here is the plot advancement, not the match itself.<\/p>\n

It’s worth mentioning the other main storyline involving Nexus, since it might get involved here. \u00a0Barrett is also feuding with Nexus member David Otunga, who seems to fancy himself as an alternate leader for the group. \u00a0The WWE still seem convinced that there’s some value in Otunga, perhaps because he’s married to Jennifer Hudson, but thus far he’s looked average at best. \u00a0In any event, given that they’ve surely got to do something unexpected, I wouldn’t be entirely surprised to see Otunga interfere against<\/em> Barrett.<\/p>\n

Nonetheless, my guess would be that Barrett wins, in a match with even more storyline twists than you’d normally expect, and goes on to a relatively short title run (since they’ll have to get the belt off him in time for Wrestlemania in the spring). \u00a0I can’t really see where you go if Orton wins.<\/p>\n

2. \u00a0World Heavyweight Title: Kane v Edge.<\/strong> Over on Smackdown, Kane unexpectedly finds himself defending their version of the world title yet again. \u00a0He’s had it since July now. \u00a0He was supposed to lose it to the Undertaker at the climax of their three-month feud, but then it turned out that Undertaker needed more time off for health reasons. \u00a0And so Kane beat him after all, moving on to face a new challenger that the writers never really planned for him to meet.<\/p>\n

That challenger is Edge, who was drafted over from Raw and turned into a babyface in an attempt to balance out the roster a bit. \u00a0There’s not much in the way of storyline here beyond the usual pre-title feuding – well, allowing for the general quasi-mystical insanity that tends to crop up in Kane’s stories, anyway. \u00a0So the only real question here is, allowing for the fact that they’re lumbered with a champion they didn’t actually want, are they just going to parachute the belt onto Edge, a more established main eventer, albeit one who’s generally more effective as a heel? \u00a0My guess would be that they’ll drag it out a little longer before switching the belt, especially if the Raw title is changing hands, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see Edge win.<\/p>\n

Kane’s basically a big strong guy, which isn’t really an ideal complement for Edge, so I imagine we’ll get the old “speed versus power” routine – it’ll be okay, it probably won’t be fantastic.<\/p>\n

3. \u00a0WWE Intercontinental Title: Dolph Ziggler v. Kaval.<\/strong> Ah, the pay-per-view debut of Kaval. \u00a0He’s an acclaimed indie wrestler, better known in those circles as Low-Ki, who won the second season of NXT<\/em>. \u00a0The results of that season depended partly on fan voting, and since he doesn’t seem to have been the WWE’s first choice, I can only assume the voting was legitimate. \u00a0You’d think that when somebody’s winning the vote, critically acclaimed, and getting a decent crowd reaction, the company would realise that there’s something there after all. \u00a0But the WWE is slow to adapt to wrestlers who don’t fit the house style, especially if they’re small. \u00a0Still, at least they gave him half decent theme music<\/a>.<\/p>\n

As an NXT<\/em> winner, Kaval gets the right to challenge the champion of his choice on PPV. \u00a0In practice he’s been tied up doing the dreaded losing streak gimmick since his debut. \u00a0On Friday – yes, this is a last-minute affair – he finally got his first win by pinning IC champion Dolph Ziggler and promptly cashed in his title shot. \u00a0He could<\/em> have chosen to go for the world title, but hey, baby steps.<\/p>\n

Ziggler recently had some excellent matches with Daniel Bryan, and I expect he’ll mesh well with Kaval too. \u00a0Coming off the long losing streak, Kaval really ought to win here, although given the WWE’s ambivalent-at-best attitude to wrestlers from his background, nothing would surprise me. \u00a0Either way, on paper it’s the best match on the show by a mile.<\/p>\n

4. \u00a0WWE Tag Team Titles: Justin Gabriel & Heath Slater v. Santino Morella & Vladimir Kozlov.<\/strong> Added to the card at the last minute. \u00a0The champions are Nexus members Gabriel and Slater, who were more or less handed the titles by Barrett after Cena won them for the group. \u00a0Gabriel is the stand-out in-ring performer of Nexus, and it’s good to see them making more use of him. \u00a0Slater is less notable, but fine in his role. \u00a0Logically, they really ought<\/em> to be defending the titles against the de facto<\/em> previous champions of Drew McIntyre and Cody Rhodes, who lost their titles to Nexus and never got a rematch. \u00a0But that’s a heel\/heel match, so we’re apparently going to gloss over it.<\/p>\n

Showing the shortage of babyface tag teams on the roster, we’re instead getting a rare PPV appearance for comedy babyface tag team Santino Morella and Vladimir Kozlov, who spend most of their time these days fighting undercard teams on Superstars<\/em>, the company’s C-show. \u00a0Morella is a comedy Italian, the broadness of the stereotype being part of the joke. \u00a0Kozlov is a big Russian – well, actually he’s Ukrainian, but it’s not like the audience can tell the accents apart – who was briefly pushed as a main eventer before they figured out that he’s not on that level. \u00a0They’re a perfectly serviceable undercard tag team but I can only assume they’re being fed to Slater and Gabriel as opponents. \u00a0The inexperienced Nexus team may have trouble getting a good match out of Morella and Kozlov, neither of whom has ever been noted for their technical prowess. \u00a0If they keep it short and play up the comedy, they should be okay.<\/p>\n

5. \u00a0Divas Title: Michelle McCool & Layla El v. Natalya Neidhart.<\/strong> Michelle and Layla have been doing their “Mean Girls” gimmick as self-proclaimed co-champions for a while now. \u00a0The idea here is that plucky babyface Natalya gets one more shot at their title, but only on the basis that she has to take them both on at once. \u00a0Now, since Natalya spends most of her time as a support act for the Hart Dynasty tag team – who’ve just split up – she’s got to be moved on to something else. \u00a0And frankly, the co-champion gimmick has been running for so long that it’s probably time to draw a line under it. \u00a0Natalya’s one of the better actual wrestlers in the women’s division – and to be honest, the heels are both better than you might think – so this might be passable as long as it’s short.<\/p>\n

6. \u00a0John Morrison v. Sheamus.<\/strong> Added to the card at the last minute, but this is at least based on a running storyline from Raw. \u00a0In theory the idea is that Sheamus has been bullying undercard comedy babyface Santino Marella and that Morrison keeps coming to the rescue. \u00a0In practice, because they haven’t written it very well, the deal is that Sheamus has a perfectly understandable grudge against the pesky Marella, and Morrison really ought to mind his own business. \u00a0But never mind. \u00a0Morrison’s not been very well used in recent months, and they could do with pushing him in order to fill some of the vacancies at the top of the card. \u00a0My instinct is that Morrison needs the win (which won’t do Sheamus any harm), and that these two could probably have a good match. \u00a0However, it’s so far down the card that I doubt they’ll get more than 10 minutes at a push.<\/p>\n

7. \u00a0Elimination match: Rey Mysterio, the Big Show, Chris Masters, Kofi Kingston & MVP v. Alberto Del Rio, Cody Rhodes, Drew McIntyre, Jack Swagger & Tyler Reks.<\/strong> Basically an exercise in getting Smackdown’s spare main eventers and upper midcarders on the card. \u00a0Oh, and Chris Masters and Tyler Reks, who are making up the numbers. \u00a0Mysterio and Del Rio have been feuding on and off for months, Del Rio being the cocky new Mexican heel, but there’s no real storyline to this beyond a straightforward gathering of teams for a conventional Survivor Series<\/em> elimination match. \u00a0Mind you, most of these wrestlers are good, and the ones that aren’t can easily be disguised in a ten-man match. \u00a0It’s a low enough priority that I expect it’ll be a bit rushed, mind you. \u00a0On the basis that the heels probably need the heat more and that it helps to continue the story, I’d pick them to win.<\/p>\n

Worth buying?<\/strong> I have no real interest in Edge\/Kane, and while I’m intrigued to see where they go with Orton\/Barrett, I suspect I’d be happy enough just reading the results. \u00a0Mind you, Sheamus\/Morrison and the elimination match are solid, and Kaval\/Ziggler sounds very good, so while it’s far from a classic card, there’s enough promising material on the undercard combined with a big main event storyline on Raw to give fans some reason to pick this up.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The WWE sure is making life easy for me with these columns. \u00a0Once again, we’ve got a card that’s based around one or two core matches, with the rest filled out randomly at the last minute. \u00a0Which means there’s less to say about them. Survivor Series, in theory, is one of the major shows on […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-wrestling"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=602"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":603,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/602\/revisions\/603"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.housetoastonish.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}