RSS Feed
May 27

Eurovision 2012

Posted on Sunday, May 27, 2012 by Paul in Music

Since it’s a quiet week for new comics, let’s talk about Eurovision!

I’m going to assume that even the Americans among you have a vague understanding of what the Eurovision Song Contest is, since I’ve written about it before.  In short: “Eurovision” is the European Broadcasting Union, which is an organisation of European (or close enough) broadcasters.  Among their many and eccentric activities is the annual Eurovision Song Contest, notionally an international songwriting contest, but actually conceived mainly as an excuse to show off the cutting edge technical possibilities of 1956.  Each country puts in a song, each country votes, winner gets to host the show next year.

The Eurovision Song Contest has a proud tradition of being almost totally detached from anything that might be described as actual popular music anywhere in Europe, though every so often (as with this year’s winner) something comes along to challenge that.  Sometimes even the oddities are genuinely entertaining in their own right.  And sometimes entire countries either phone it in or transparently take the piss.  The result is a truly unique spectacle – songs you’d never hear anywhere else, often for very good reason, locked in flamboyantly bizarre battle.

Since last year’s winner automatically gets to host the show, this year’s broadcast came from Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan.  Baku is so far to the east that in order for the four-hour show to air in prime time in the rest of Europe, the show had to start at midnight local time.

The cost of hosting the Eurovision Song Contest is widely regarded as crippling, particularly in the current financial climate.  Reportedly, the Spanish broadcaster actually told its act to for god’s sake not win.  You might think this would provide problems for Azerbaijan.  But in fact, Azerbaijan is an oil rich state which can spend a lot of money when it wants to.  This year, they spent that money on bulldozing part of central Baku in order to put up a remarkably over the top venue – complete with walls that could change colour to reflect the flag of the performer – that was genuinely impressive for seven months’ building.  The obligatory interstitial videos between songs – which are often plainly a product of the local tourist board – were also very proud of the admittedly flashy new Flame Towers, which can (literally) change colour.  It’s only as the show wears on that you realise that the interstitials are showing us the same square mile of Baku again… and again… and again…

Azerbaijan is basically a dictatorship, and the government has been rather keen to keep the human rights protestors off the streets – naturally failing to appreciate that the international PR backlash from this sort of behaviour is far worse than anything that would have been caused by just allowing the protestors to gather.  Similarly, it seems that nobody in power realised how the rest of Europe was likely to react when faced with an interval act starring the President’s son-in-law.  (Particularly since they also managed to get together the last five winners to perform a medley of their songs – a far more entertaining act – and then put it on semi-final 2.)

All this oddity notwithstanding, the actual show has the familiar mix of the unexpectedly good, the expectedly terrible,  the outright inexplicable, and the thoroughly tedious.

This year’s winner is Sweden, which took the thoroughly unsporting approach of entering a song that was successful in the real world.  Already selling strongly in five countries – and shooting straight to the top of the UK iTunes chart based solely on Eurovision exposure – “Euphoria” by Loreen looks to be something we haven’t had in a while, a genuine, full scale, international hit launched from Eurovision.

There’s a very real chance I’ll be writing about this in the chart post next week, but in outline: Loreen was the fourth-placer runner-up in Idol in 2004 (in Sweden, broadcasters figure that the audience know what country they’re in).  She put out the obligatory token single and then, it seems, vanished into TV production for several years, only to re-emerge in Sweden last year with another attempt to enter Eurovision.

Loreen was also apparently the only contestant to go and visit the human rights protestors.  You can imagine how that went down with the authorities.  They must have been delighted when she won.

“Euphoria” is genuine pop music; it’s a trance record, but a very well put together one.  And the staging is brilliant.  Listen to the record in isolation and you’d probably expect them to go for the bright colours and the squadron of backing dancers.  But faced with an enormous stage full of video screens – as you’ll see below – the Swedes have opted to kill the lights and have her perform (mostly) alone in semi-darkness.  It really gives the impression that you’re watching something more than just a regular dance record, and it suggests that she may well have what it takes to do something with this career boost.  This is what “trying to win the Eurovision Song Contest properly” looks like.

Britain, meanwhile, chose to enter Englebert Humperdinck.  It came second-last, spawning the usual bitter complaints that Europe doesn’t appreciate us.  (Normally they blame the eastern europeans for voting for one another, but with Sweden winning, that one won’t really fly.)

I do actually feel somewhat sorry for Humperdinck here.  We’ve entered a lot worse than this, and it does kind of grow on you after a while.  There were far drearier songs than this in the show.  And yes, it was on first, which isn’t great in a running order of 26.  But it’s dated, it’s not instant, and it was never going to win in a million years.  Humperdinck can at least take comfort in knowing that the people in last place were Norway, and they got through the semi-finals, which is more than 20 other countries managed.  (The UK, as a major financial contributor, gets an automatic bye to the finals.  There is a theory that some voters are resentful of this, for some strange reason.)

The UK makes pop music that sells around Europe.  We just don’t enter it in the Eurovision Song Contest.  And that’s why we lose.  The Englebert Humperdinck song didn’t even sell in Britain.  It peaked at number 60.  So they’re hardly going to vote for it in the Czech Republic, are they?

Back with the songs people actually remembered: this year’s obligatory high-profile novelty hit was from Russia, who entered “Party for Everybody” by Buranovskiye Babushki (“The Grannies from Buranov”).  The grannies actually won the national phone vote, beating legitimate pop stars in the process.  The Russians may be turning sarcastic.  “We are singing so strongly”, the lyrics assure us.  Well, no, no you’re not.  But once it picks up it is undeniably catchy.

This is their second attempt to enter Eurovision for Russia.  In 2010, the Russian voters strangely did not opt for their song “Dlinnaja-Dlinnaja Beresta I Kak Sdelat Iz Nee Aishon”.  (If Wikipedia is to be believed, the title translates as “Very Long Birch Bark and How to Turn It into a Turban.”)

What else is worthy of your notice?  Certainly not third-placed Serbia, which was a generic dirge.  Many were mystified by the high placing of Albania, with “Suus” by Rona Nishliu.  Albanian experimental jazz/soul was not previously thought to be a popular genre, but since it came fifth, we may need to rethink this.  The performance is odd.  The first half is relatively sensible.  By the end she appears to be attempting to establish contact with whales.  Quite a few countries did give it maximum points, and not all of them had substantial Albanian minority populations…  At any rate, it is fair to say this really is something you will not see on prime time television anywhere but on the Eurovision Song Contest.

Turkey opted for “Love Me Back” by Can Bonomo, which seems to have escaped from some sort of weird klezmer-based musical.  The choreography is extraordinary, though I still quite make up my mind whether it’s good or bad extraordinary.  It’s fair to say everyone remember it by the end of the night.  Stick with it for the boat spot.

Italy, another country that gets an automatic bye to the finals, had an unusually decent year, entering the local equivalent of Amy Winehouse – “L’amore e femmina” by Nina Zilli.  And when I say she’s the local equivalent of Amy Winehouse… I’m really not kidding.  This is practically a tribute act.  Came 9th.

This year’s obligatory “dragged through the XXXX/English dictionary” award goes to Moldova, with Pasha Parfeny’s “Lautar”.  It’s catchy.  But as choruses go, “You have never been to my show / You have never seen before how looks the trumpet” leaves something to be desired.  He still managed a respectable 11th place.

And no, I don’t know why he’s dressed for woodwork.

Macedonia‘s entry, “Cmo i Belo” by Kaliopi, is a bit of a grower.  Operatic pop-rock from a stern Macedonian woman, basically, but it does have a great chorus.  I like the needless high note in the bridge, which must have sent dogs scurrying from the room all over Europe.  She’s apparently a huge star in Macedonia, and has been for the better part of 20 years.

Jedward there at the end, representing Ireland again. We’ll skip over that.

France – who, again, get a bye – actually tried this year, with “Echo (You and I)” by Anggun.  It deserved way better than its lowly 22nd placing. First verse is a bit weak but it picks up. (Admittedly, judging from her Wikipedia entry, Anggun is a bit past her commercial prime in France; she hasn’t had a hit there since 2007. But she’s closer to commercial relevance than Englebert Humperdinck…)

As for songs that got knocked out in the semis, you’ll be pleased to hear that the wisdom of European voters has, for a second time, spared final-viewers from encountering Austria rap outfit the Trackshittaz, whose music simply cannot be (and is not) as good as their name implies.  San Marino attempts to hitch itself to a bandwagon from five years ago with “The Social Network Song”.

It’s called “The Social Network Song” because Eurovision rules ban product placement. The original title – I swear, really – was “The Facebook Song Uh, Oh, Oh (A Satirical Song)”. Exactly what was satirical about it has never been clearly established.

I have no idea what The Netherlands were thinking when they opted to have a stab at country and western.  This was a top ten hit in Holland, so perhaps it’s just a bad performance…

And as for Georgia, their entry resembles an iPod stuck on shuffle.  You’ve only got three minutes, guys!  You don’t need to work every idea into it!  Especially when you’ve actually got a few good hooks fighting for room in there.

Bring on the comments

  1. Dave O'Neill says:

    As an Irishman, I’m morally obliged to defend Jedward by saying “I’d like to see you try”. Plus I’ve met them, and they are pretty decent guys. Also I have a thing for their hot backing singer Leanne Moore.

    Also, if any other Irish people are reading (I know Paul O’Regan does) – who the hell else were we supposed to put forward? The yokel that won the Voice? Daniel O’Donnell? (Actually not the worst idea). Someone on Twitter last night said we should say fuck it, and get U2 to do it.

    As for Britain? You probably should have gone with Steps.

  2. Ken says:

    I saw an article where Humperdinck was ambushed by some reporter trying to shame him into some response about performing in a country with human rights abuses, and with the Sweden chick winning, I have to think politics played more of a role this year than in years past. And really, if people want to make a big deal about Azerbaijan, just, you know, kick them out of the competition (and any other country that doesn’t meet a certain standard).

    Kind of a weak year, Italy’s song was probably the best I thought.

  3. Mika says:

    As I’m not a fan of big ballads, I was surprised that my favourite song of the night was Spain’s entry.

    But then, I liked the Norwegian guy. Clearly, what do I know?

  4. kingderella says:

    i live in the netherlands, and i have no idea what their (im not actually dutch myself) entry was supposed to be about. i guess its an attempt to contribute to the general what-the-fuck-ness of eurovision.

  5. Chris from NY says:

    Two questions: Is this a once a year show, or like Idol, does it air every week for a few months?

    What’s the point of having an act go around for a second time? I hear about Jedward from the the Irish Times, but not why they were entered in again this year. Is there not really any other acts out there who go for this? Sounds like stunt broadcasting to me.

  6. robniles says:

    Italy’s my favorite too—it helped that in the promo clip, she’s not actually sporting the Winehouse hair—but Sweden’s a decent winner too. Combining the “Till the World Ends” hook with Kate Bush-lite moves…why not?

    Among the trainwrecks, Montenegro’s my clear pick. Even INXS didn’t push the rhyming dictionary as far as “Liberalism, tourism, nudism, optimism/It is good for rheumatism.”

  7. S says:

    I feel nuts, but I think the Netherlands was the best one! The visuals definitely don’t help it though.

  8. Carey says:

    @Chris from NY

    “Two questions: Is this a once a year show, or like Idol, does it air every week for a few months?

    What’s the point of having an act go around for a second time? I hear about Jedward from the the Irish Times, but not why they were entered in again this year. Is there not really any other acts out there who go for this? Sounds like stunt broadcasting to me.”

    This is a once a year event, and as Paul said at the beginning, was instigated back in the mid 1950’s as a way of fine tuning the technology for broadcasting live events across Europe. The actual competitive element of Eurovision isn’t the singers, but the song: the song needs to be a new composition, and not released before a certain amount of time before the final. Anyone can sing the song– they don’t even need to be from the entrant country: most famously, Celine Dion sang the winning entry for Switzerland back in 1989. The last winning entry for the UK back in 1997 was sung by someone from New Zealand.

    At it’s heart, it’s a huge fun with a definite camp element, and as much as people complain about the politics that may (or may not) be behind the voting, that simply adds to the enjoyment. Even before the former Soviet states entered the competition there were patterns of recognisable behaviour: France never votes for the UK, Ireland and Malta regularly do, and for several years, no matter what the quality of its songs, Germany and Turkey would regularly give each other maximum points because the former had a large immigrant population from the later. Cyprus, meanwhile, has never vote for Turkey since 1974.

    @House to Astonish: no love for the Ukraine entry, Paul? Probably my second favourite of the night (and further proof that the block voting amongst the former Soviet Satellite states is overblown, as iirc it finished in the lower half of the competitors.

    Great summation other than that though.

  9. Tom Clarke says:

    I like the idea that Ireland will be entering Jedward for the next 60 years, in a “My Lovely Horse” (Google It) scenario that becomes a national tradition.

  10. Paul says:

    “What’s the point of having an act go around for a second time? I hear about Jedward from the the Irish Times, but not why they were entered in again this year. Is there not really any other acts out there who go for this? ”

    It’s a combination of Ireland not really wanting to win (they can’t afford to host it), and being a country where no credible act would go within a mile of the show. These factors don’t apply in eastern Europe, where local stars appear happy to enter the show, and government seem to think that their obscure countries can only benefit from four hours of primetime exposure. This is one reason why the eastern Europeans have done pretty well in recent years – they’re genuinely trying to win.

  11. weevil says:

    Jedward came 8th last year, why shouldn’t they get another go.

    There are 42 countries competing, on average Ireland should expect to make the top ten one year in four, and get eliminated in the semis one year in three.

    People just seem to have ridiculous expectations of success.

  12. weevil says:

    Now that I actually look at the history, it’s the same for the UK. In the 13 contests this century, they’ve come top 20 seven times. That includes 3rd, 5th and, just last year, 11th.

    I think part of the problem is that can’t be eliminated in the semifinals, so a middling performance doesn’t feel like an improvement.
    Instead it’s “oh we’re last again, as usual.”

  13. odessasteps says:

    As I said to Al on twitter, next year, Britain should just have 5 minutes of Murray Gold playing Dr Who music with Karen Gillan and the new companion dancing to it in wacky/skimpy costumes.

  14. Ivo says:

    Hm, no mention of the Portuguese act? It was a beautiful song.

  15. Jean-Paul says:

    I totally hope Jedward become Eurovision mainstays.

    I can’t remember ANY of the songs from this year. So dull! No Getter Jaani or Zdob Si Djub this time round!

    I always expect at least two genuinely good pop songs from Eurovision, but ocht! Maybe I am expecting too much and I should just enjoy a man moonwalking while pretending to play bagpipes, and shut up.

    The Turkish hunks who transformed into a boat was pretty ace, though.

  16. Leo says:

    I did like Sweden’s song and performance and think that it did deserve to win, despite the heavy “my heart will go on” undertones.

    However I believe it is noteworthy to say that the production is handled by the Swedish. As a resoult, the directing in this song focused on closeups to the act, the camera was always in the perfect angle to catch the performance. In every other song the camera moved frantically, always picking the worst angles and most of the time from a great distance.

    As for France deserving better, the song was inoffensive but the performance was bad. They had some pretty athletes doing gymnastics and expected it would bring them victory? Sure, something similar helped Russia win three years ago but in Russia’s case it was actually dancing instead of gymnastics.

    I don’t see any mention of the Greek entree but it’s ok, even the Greeks forgot all about eurovision this year and our song wasn’t anything to write home about. But Cyprus’s song deserved better.

    Overall I enjoyed this year’s show though it was full of songs that excaped from the 90’s

  17. Fraser says:

    There was a disappointing lack of laugh-out-loud songs this year. And there was a shocking lack of clothing removal. No skirts or shirts were ripped off at all. Jedward by rights should’ve ended up in their Speedo and inflatable arm bands for their jump in the water, it’s what Bucks Fizz would’ve done.

    Tho the Russian grannies, plus the genius Turkish boat moment definitely made up for some of that.

  18. Prodigial says:

    Sweeden’s was my favourite. But in a competition where something like Norway’s gets through… you can’t help but just watch it for laughs

  19. Brad says:

    It’s a mystery to me why no cable network in the USA has ever taken a flyer on broadcasting this. It seems like with the 8,000 or so channels we have on cable in the States nowadays that SOMEONE would think “Hmmmm, let’s see what kind of response Eurovision would get here.”

    It sounds like quite a hoot to me, and I’m betting it could get a pretty decent cult following here in the colonies. Plus, it would educate Americans that there are more countries in Europe than England, France, Germany and that place up north with all the blondes.

Leave a Reply