RSS Feed
Mar 12

The X-Axis – 11 March 2012

Posted on Monday, March 12, 2012 by Paul in x-axis

These are going to be fairly brief, but hey, better than waiting for another week…

Age of Apocalypse #1 – To give credit where it’s due, if the X-office are under orders to come up with yet more ways of expanding the franchise, at least this one clearly has its own identity, rather than being yet another X-Men title (of which they shipped three last week).  The original “Age of Apocalypse” alternate-reality crossover was way back in the 90s, but it was recently dusted off in X-Force as part of the “Dark Angel Saga” – no doubt with an eye on promoting this title, though there’s nothing wrong with that.

Despite the title, Apocalypse himself is nowhere to be seen in this new series.  Instead, he’s long dead, and his heir Wolverine is running the world instead.  The humans have largely been wiped out and a handful of guerrilla rebels defending the few survivors form the main cast (joined by the local versions of Jean Grey and Sabretooth, both of whom lost their powers in a Convenient Plot Contrivance in X-Force‘s Point One issue).

Writer David Lapham establishes quite a few concepts in the first issue.  The attention-grabbing central idea is that the stars of the series are all characters who, in the mainstream Marvel Universe, are raving anti-mutant lunatics.  In the context of the Age of Apocalypse, where the mutants really are genocidal lunatics, those same characters become passionate defenders of truth and justice.  Oddly, most of them also seem to be better people in this world, rather than just lunatics who look better because of the context.  Presumably this is one of Lapham’s central themes for the series – the idea that these characters become heroes when placed in a world where their particular obsessions happen to be right.

Along with that, we’ve got a curious subplot about a journalist narrator who’s stumbled from our world into the Age of Apocalypse, apparently serving as the point of view character.  Harper Simmons seems to be a new character, and he’s apparently here to serve as the point of view character – with his past tense narration implying that at some point he escapes back to Earth.  Mind you, his narration reads more like melodramatic narration than journalism.  Alongside all that, there’s the set-up of Jean and Sabretooth on the fringes of the mutant group, and individual introductions for all of the new characters.  And a subplot about Wolverine deciding to hunt for Jean.  And a cliffhanger ending with a surprise return.

So there’s a lot here.  Whether it actually grabs me is another matter.  Perhaps inevitably, there’s a sense that the members of the X-Terminated are multiple variations on the same character, admittedly with different emphasis.  I can’t honestly say any of them really grab me.  Roberto de la Torre’s art is stylish but sometimes lacking in clarity.  And both the writing and the art takes itself desperately seriously.  I think one reason why the original Age of Apocalypse worked was because everyone knew going in that it was a four-month story, so it was about how this world fell apart.  But as a setting to tell stories in on an ongoing basis… I don’t know about that.  It’s a very professional book, but it doesn’t feel like much fun.

Uncanny X-Men #8 – The end of the “Tabula Rasa” arc, which is oddly structured indeed.  The battle against the Immortal Man was wrapped up last month, leaving this issue to tie up the remaining subplots – Namor and Hope with the underwater people, Colossus rescuing Magik – and to stabilise the ecology.  And the two subplots work rather well, with Namor’s ladies-man persona being played bizarrely as he charms a weird-looking slug thing, and Magik having to talk Colossus down again.

The actual resolution of Tabula Rasa’s problems, though, ends up as something of a throwaway, as a big dome is simply put over the place.  While this makes perfect sense logically, I can’t help thinking this would have been a stronger issue if the main storyline had finished up here, instead of last month.

Greg Land’s art remains decent on the fantasy elements, inconsistent on the humans.  He doesn’t really have the subtlety to do comedy; he struggles with the Magik scene, though he does do a rather good Colossus.  And the dreaded Enormous Grin makes its return on Hope.

Decent storyline overall, but slightly odd pacing to wrap the main plot an issue early.

Wolverine #302 – This “Back in Japan” storyline is kind of all over the place.  Both the story and art are wildly uneven.  The art’s split between Billy Tan and Steve Sanders, and while the story at least allocates the pages more sensible this time, the fact remains that their styles clash horrendously.  And the story can’t seem to figure out whether it’s playing the whole thing for over-the-top laughs or trying to go for serious angst with Wolverine drugged and thinking he’s back in hell.  The throwaway use of the recently-returned Sabretooth is still just plain bizarre.  I’m more sold on powering-up Mystique so that Wolverine can’t identify her by scent any more – that just removes a plot obstacle that lets her shape changing power work effectively.  But for the most part, I’m kind of confused about what Jason Aaron’s going for with this story, and pretty certain that the art is doing it no favours.

Wolverine and the X-Men: Alpha and Omega #3 – This, on the other hand, is much better.  After the slightly rocky start, it’s now clear that we’re not really being expected to care about the Construct world at all – it exists to be disbelieved, even by the characters in it – so that the real battle is between Wolverine trying to find his way out, and Quentin trying to…  Well, not so much win as figure out what the hell he’s going to do to get out of this mess, since he’s completely crossed the line.

The split art on this book, with Mark Brooks drawing the Construct scenes and Roland Boschi drawing the real world, works much better, since their respective styles actually emphasise the differences and help the flow of the book, instead of feeling randomly assigned.  And both are good storytellers in their own right, which helps.  It’s also a very good story for Quentin, which gets the character’s mixture of overconfidence and belated realisation that he’s out of his depth, and allowing him to be more than just a super villain in waiting.  Good book.

X-Club #4 – An issue of running around combined with extremely dense exposition, as we finally get a clear explanation of what’s going on, in the form of an extremely compressed four-page origin flashback for a rather convoluted concept that turns out to be the plot device behind this whole thing.  You know, like they used to do in the 70s.  It’s very compressed, this, and I suspect the series as a whole could have been better paced to avoid hitting a massive info dump like this in the penultimate chapter.

But it’s still a book with a lot of fun ideas in it, and I like the way Si Spurrier is trying to give every member of the group their own parallel story, rather than writing them as a group.  (After all, splitting them up is the simplest way to stop Dr Nemesis from drowning out Kavita and Madison altogether.)  Yes, the talking starfish gag feels like it ran its course a while ago, and yes, the “Danger is pregnant” stuff is a bit silly – the art really struggles to sell it, with the final page cliffhanger looking more cumbersome that was presumably intended.  But there’s some fun stuff in here and it’s hard not to like a book which throws this many ideas at the wall.

X-Men #26 – So… the X-Men have gone to an island to rescue Jubilee from the Forgiven, but it turns out the Forgiven are Good Vampires.  And now a bunch of mercenary characters randomly attack the island because they’re after the Forgiven.  So the X-Men and the Forgiven have to team up to fight them.  And that’s basically it.

It’s a thin story, let’s be blunt.  And it seems to be conceived mainly as a device to have the various members of the Forgiven take on B-list villains and show off their stuff.  In theory that’s fine, since it’s an opportunity to showcase the characters.  Trouble is, they still aren’t doing anything especially memorable in their respective scenes.  I’m just not seeing what the hook is meant to be.

Still, it does make a pleasant change for the attacking horde of randoms to be made up of characters from recent stories or continuity backwaters – Black Axe, Bruiser, Lady Bullseye – instead of the usual suspects from the 1980s Official Handbook.  If new characters are going to take root in the Marvel Universe, other writers need to be willing to use them.  (That said, I seriously question the wisdom of using Lord Deathstrike in this book before Jason Aaron has even finished his first arc in Wolverine, and at a stage when he’s still being used in that book as an unstoppable newcomer.  Once Wolverine’s beaten him, then he can have a sword fight with Jubilee.)

All this would be fine if the Forgiven were more interesting, but so far, they’re just not working.

Bring on the comments

  1. kelvingreen says:

    Black Axe? Really? Crikey, I never thought I’d see him return.

  2. alex says:

    IMPERIOUS SEX!

  3. Chris says:

    Great reviews as always!

    Harper Simmons, though, isn’t a new character, but appeared (I suppose a different version of him) in Uncanny X-Force #10, when he got the scoop about the team from the Shadow King and was then attacked by Warren.

  4. Suzene says:

    re: AOA

    It’s set in a dystopia that’s even grimmer than the original AOA, and where the Glenn Becks and Fred Phelps’ of the 616!verse get to be right. I guess it could be an interesting inversion (really not my cuppa; the X-Books themselves were depressing enough for a while there that I’ve had my fill), but I have a hard time thinking that “fun” is going to be in great supply for this one.

  5. Well, it’s written by Lapham. He’s not exactly who you go to for a fun book (though I guess he did write Deadpool Max?).

  6. Maxwell's Hammer says:

    Can’t say that I was in love with X-Club after it’s first issue, but I’ve become quite excited about it’s increasingly manic plot, and I really like the pathetically love-lorn characterization of Madison Jeffries.

  7. Niall says:

    X-Club is fun. I would love to see an X-Club Maxi-series, what are the chances?

    It would be nice to give the characters a bit of room to grow.

  8. TF_Loki says:

    What was the point of de-powering AOA Jean and Sabes again? As if they aren’t badly outnumbered and outgunned already.

  9. Brad says:

    It’s all well and good that Victor Gischler wants to write a vampire comic, and the time is probably ripe for such a thing what with the popularity of Twilight and The Vampire Diaries and Being Human and True Blood, etc. But good God, get them out of the X-Men – have Dr. Strange or somebody cure Jubilee of vampirism and then let’s just forget this nonsense ever happened.

    Yes, vampires are a part of the 616 but just because Chris Claremont decided to shoehorn a Dracula story into the X-Men back in the 80s doesn’t mean it makes for a good fit to have vampires running around in the X-books. Claremont had an abundance of perfectly lousy ideas that deserve to be forgotten about, no matter how iconic his original run on the books was.

  10. Delpire says:

    “Well, it’s written by Lapham. He’s not exactly who you go to for a fun book (though I guess he did write Deadpool Max?).”

    You must be completely unfamiliar with Lapham’s work. Maybe try and read Young Liars, Stray Bullets, Amy Racecar.

  11. Brian says:

    “Yes, vampires are a part of the 616 but just because Chris Claremont decided to shoehorn a Dracula story into the X-Men back in the 80s”

    Actually, Dracula was established as a 616 character well before Claremont’s story, but I do agree that X-Men shouldn’t do vampires.

  12. Brian says:

    This has nothing to do with this week’s reviews but I thought it might be of interest to Paul and some others here.

    It’s an excerpt from “The X-Men Companion” published by Fantagraphics Books in 1982. The Companion was a two-volume compilation of interviews conducted by comics historian Peter Sanderson with various creators who had worked on X-Men (Thomas, Claremont, Byrne, Cockrum, Wein, etc.) Towards the end of the second volume, there’s an interview between Sanderson, Claremont and Louise Jones (this was before she married Walt Simonson) concerning the upcoming “The New Mutants” series which was to be the first X-Men spin-off title.

    Anyway, here’s the excerpt:

    SANDERSON: “Is either one of you afraid that there might be an opinion in fandom that Marvel’s exploiting the X-Men? Do you worry about overexposing the concept?”

    JONES: “No, actually we’re not, because we’re doing a whole different book.”

    CLAREMONT: “That’s why we’re trying so hard to make it so different, is that we don’t want this to be an exploitation book.”

    Heh. My how things have changed.

  13. Karl Hiller says:

    Vampires are a lousy fit for the X-Men because they reduce the good guys to reactive genocidal killers. “Vampires are evil and we have to kill them all” is not far from “The only good mutant is a dead mutant.” The fact that Good Vampires like Jubilee exist should throw at least some of the team into a moral crisis, after all the vampires they’ve killed recently.

  14. Karl Hiller says:

    Gischler’s vampires are a lousy fit for the Marvel universe, period. All his ancient tribes and intrigues would be fine* in their own universe, but not in one where vampires were totally wiped out of existence by Dr. Strange a while back, and only recently allowed to exist again.

    * albeit fairly boring, based on what I’ve seen.

  15. Paul says:

    “Heh. My how things have changed.”

    Well, yes and no. According to some accounts, Marvel’s original idea was WEST COAST X-MEN, and NEW MUTANTS was pitched by Claremont in an attempt to head that off.

  16. Brian says:

    Yeah, that was covered during the same interview. According to Claremont, he and Jones had the New Mutants idea before the X-Men West thing came about but they didn’t want to pitch it immediately because they were afraid they’d be a stuck with a penciler they didn’t necessarily want to work with, but then…

    CLAREMONT: “While we were pretty much solidifying the concept, Mark Gruenwald went into Jim Shooter’s office with a proposal for an alternative X-Men book involving the “loose” members of the original team (Angel, Iceman, Havok, Polaris and setting them up on the West Coast as a kind of a…”

    JONES: “X-Men West.”

    CLAREMONT: “And regardless of the individual merits of the concept, it was way different from what we had in mind. Jim quite properly went to Weezie and said that this proposal had been made to him. Weezie pointed out that we had our own concept in the works and had it for quite some time. And Jim said, “Okay, well let’s hear it.” so we had to put up or shut up.

    JONES: “So we told him and he said “Okay.”

    CLAREMONT: “And luckily, at about the same time Bob McLeod had just surfaced…”

  17. Niall says:

    In case you haven’t heard, X-treme X-Men is returning.

    Why would they use that ridiculous name? Hopefully, it’s some sort of 90s parody book.

  18. Si says:

    I treme, you treme, we all treme for X-treme!

  19. Maybe X-Treme X-Men will be set in New Orleans after Hurricaine Katrina.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treme_(TV_series)

  20. Taibak says:

    Actually, doesn’t Rogue have a house in New Orleans? Between her and Gambit….

  21. Tdubs says:

    I’m hoping the new x-treme is simply a rebranding of vol 3 of x-men. I have my fingers crossed still Bendis is moving to FF and not Uncanny. Paul and Al, I hope you guys review Saga and Saucer Country this weekend. My Shop was shorted on both and I have to wait for them.

  22. Jerry Ray says:

    I’d really rather see Bendis move to DC than onto FF (which is quite good right now) or the X-Men books (which are alright, but more importantly, wouldn’t be improved by adding Iron Fist and Cage to them).

  23. Valhallahan says:

    As in Marvel UK Black Axe?

  24. clay says:

    Wait, is Hickman leaving FF?

    Wait, by “FF” do you mean “Fantastic Four”, or the book “FF”?

  25. Tdubs says:

    With Hickman leaving I could see Bendis taking both titles over, I think you’ll need a big name to keep both books going. Bendis has said his next project isn’t something he is comfortable with and I could see it being big science.

  26. Andy Walsh says:

    @clay
    Hickman is leaving both Fantastic Four books in October.

  27. alex says:

    Is there really a need for “ff” when hickman leaves?

    Not that it would atop marvel to keep pumping it out.

  28. Tdubs says:

    And now we know what X-treme is and are underwhelmed. Let’s kill Nightcrawler and replace him three times.

  29. Dan Coyle says:

    Deadpool MAX may be a comedy, but it’s a weirdly humorless one.

Leave a Reply