RSS Feed
Apr 28

Guardians of the Galaxy & X-Men: Black Vortex

Posted on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 by Paul in x-axis

THE BLACK VORTEX!  Its cosmic tendrils bring corruption and devastation wheresoe’er they wind!

THE BLACK VORTEX!  Its thirteen chapters offer a glimpse into the abyss of eternity!

THE BLACK VORTEX!  Playing goth, industrial and darkwave; women enter free before midnight.

Once the X-books got to dominate crossovers, or even skip them entirely, but today things have changed.  And so here the X-Men find themselves as junior partners in a thirteen-part crossover that in fact only includes three X-books – All-New X-Men #38-39, and Cyclops #12.  The remainder of the story wends its way through two book-end one-shots, Guardians of the Galaxy #24-25, Legendary Star-Lord #9-11, Guardians Team-Up #3, Nova #28, and Captain Marvel #14.

Precisely what the X-Men are doing here at all is not 100% clear.  Kitty Pryde has a reason to be here, because she already doubles as part of Star-Lord’s supporting cast.  Yet the rest of the All-New X-Men cast could scarcely be called vital to the plot.  The plot does things to some of them, so it’s not a skippable arc for All-New readers.  But the X-Men could be pulled out of the story entirely and not a great deal would change.  For that matter, so could most of the individual Guardians.  It’s really a Star-Lord and Kitty story that’s grown arms and legs.

Chapter 1 begins with a flashback that establishes the origin of the Black Vortex.  Twelve billion years ago, for reasons the story never returns to, the people of planet Viscardi inexplicably had a Celestial standing around ignoring them, and apparently stopping them from developing interstellar flight.  A woman called Gara has a good yell at the Celestial to complain about this situation, and specifically to complain that the Celestial doesn’t seem to understand that they long to leave their world, “drea[m] higher than your grasp”, and “know the cosmos”.  Of course, people who speak to Celestials should be careful what they wish for, because the Celestial responds by creating the Black Vortex, a mirror that turns people into cosmically powered-up versions of themselves.  This seems like a tremendously useful thing, so naturally everyone submits to it, goes mad, and tears the planet apart, leaving Gara as the last survivor of her race.  So we’re establishing pretty early that submitting to the Black Vortex is probably a bad idea.

Meanwhile, Star-Lord and Kitty discover that the Vortex has fallen into the possession of Star-Lord’s arch-enemy and dad Mister Knife, who is using it to power up his henchmen (but evidently has more sense than to use it himself).  I like the name Mister Knife, by the way.  For one thing, it doesn’t sound like the stream of random characters that aliens normally get as names.  And for another, before he was Mister Knife, he was J’Son, which is just terrible.  Mister Knife is also trying to persuade Thane to submit to the Vortex – you know, Thanos’ son.  All this feels very much joined in progress, and quite what Knife is up to with Thane is never particularly clear.  I assume it was all set up in earlier issues of Star-Lord, but re-establishing it for the benefit of crossover readers wouldn’t have hurt.

Anyhow, Star-Lord and Kitty steal the Vortex halfway through chapter 1, and then enlist the X-Men and the Guardians to help them keep it safe.  So that’s your crossover.  Cue the running around.  The bad guys come after them, and by the end of the opening chapter, Gamora has already submitted to the Vortex to obtain the necessary power-up to fight back.

Chapter 2 sees our heroes run away with the Vortex to engage in some intensive conversation about whether more of them should use it in order to power themselves up.  It’s a Bendis issue – did I mention?  In fact, as a starting point, this is a perfectly reasonable argument.  It’s obvious to us that the Black Vortex must be a bad thing, because (a) we’ve seen the flashback, (b) we know how these stories work, (c) identity-subverting transformations are always sinister, and (d) it’s called the Black Vortex, for Christ’s sake.  But Gamora seems fine, they could use the power to take on Knife’s guys, and there’s a pretty reasonable split between the moral purists and the more military-minded or simply pragmatic characters who see a useful magic trinket that shouldn’t go to waste.  And so Beast (the adult version) submits too – which again makes sense, because he’s a bit desperate for some cosmic insight that might help him unscramble the damage he’s done to continuity.

Chapter 2 ends with a really badly executed cliffhanger that looks as though everyone has been transformed by the Vortex, but turns out just to be everyone looking in the mirror.  Partly, this is visually confusing; partly, what’s actually happening is so anti-climactic that it doesn’t even register as a likely reading.

Chapter 3 sees Angel sign up for the power-up too – yes, this conversation basically extends through an issue and more, because they’ve got thirteen issues to fill.  Beast and Angel look decidedly sinister in their powered-up forms, and are starting to ramble about the magnificence of the cosmos and such forth.  So, you know, it’s pretty obvious where this story is going: power corrupts, there’s no such thing as a free lunch, yadda yadda.  At any rate, having set up the premise, it’s now time to start filling those pages.  So the heroes fight among themselves, and then the baddies come after them, and the three powered-up guys take the Vortex and leave.

From here – and yes, I know there’s ten chapters to go – there’s quite a bit of running around.  The heroes are hiding from the bad guys.  The Kree steal the Vortex, so the three powered-up guys go after them to get it back.  Power levels fluctuate wildly according to the demands of the plot – if the Vortex needs to get captured the cosmic heroes can be beaten by some random Kree soldiers, otherwise they get very angry and can tear planets apart single-handedly.  Something or other is going on with Thane and Knife but like I say, nobody ever bothers to explain their relationship to X-Men readers, so I’ll assume it doesn’t matter.  And in the manner of crossovers that need to find busy work for a large cast, our heroes split up to deal with assorted troubles.

Occasionally Venom gets a line of dialogue and reminds us that he’s in the Guardians of the Galaxy these days.

And there’s a genuinely important bit for X-Men readers where, after much cosmic contemplation on the issue, cosmic Beast verifies that continuity is indeed irretrievably broken.  This has nothing in particular to do with the Black Vortex plot, though – in fact, it’s positively counter to the Black Vortex plot by implying that Beast already did far worse damage before the Vortex got anywhere near him.  So the story ends up moving on.

The Vortex is stolen again.  Nova has it for a bit.  Hala gets destroyed.  Nova takes the Vortex home to his family for tea because we’ve reached an issue of his series and he has to get the spotlight for a few pages.  He nobly resists the temptation of the Vortex.  The baddies get the Vortex back and Thane gets powered up, which I’m sure I’d care about if anybody had bothered to explain to me who the hell he is.

And then, somewhat randomly and out of nowhere, in Chapter 9 Mister Knife covers the planet of Spartax in amber and gives it to the Brood as a present, so that they can try to infect everyone on the planet with Brood eggs.   The deal is apparently that the resulting Brood army will conquer planets for Knife in return.  This now becomes the main threat for the rest of the story, and the focus switches pretty much entirely to rescuing the population of Spartax.  Star-Lord gets a really bizarre speech in which he acknowledges that the Vortex is a curse and laments ever having stolen it from his father in the first place – which rather overlooks the fact that if they hadn’t stolen the Vortex, surely Knife would have just got to the same basic plan a bit quicker?

The final issue of Cyclops crops up here, and we’ve talked about it before – it wants to play its final issue as Cyclops’s coming of age, and so it goes completely against the entire thrust of the story to date, and has Cyclops submitting to the Vortex as a heroic move where he overcomes fear.  Iceman and Groot tag along for the power-up as well.  But with the very next chapter, it’s Captain Marvel, and of course she bravely resists the temptation, in the latest iteration of a scene that the crossover is beating to death.

Ultimately, in the manner of big crossovers, there is an enormous fight.  The remaining heroes have to decide who should use the Vortex one last time to save Spartax.  Eventually Kitty does it because she doesn’t want to and is therefore the least corruptible – the old “the only person you can trust to run the universe is the person who doesn’t want the job” routine.  Kitty’s cosmically-enhanced phasing powers free Spartax, and then we get an epilogue in which most but not all of the powered-up heroes give up their powers, which nobody had previously suggested was an option.  We’re told that this will still have unspecified consequences, but none are immediately in evidence.  Then Gara – remember her? – carts the Vortex away for future sequel use.

And… that’s it.

Hold on.  Until the Spartax-in-amber thing showed up in chapter 9, wasn’t this story about a cursed power-up trinket and characters deciding whether to submit to it?  Because a bunch of characters did submit to it, and by all appearances, nothing much happened, other than they got more powerful.  And while the cosmic characters were acting all distant and weird during the story itself, the ones who choose to retain their new powers at the end (like Warren and Kitty) seem to be back to their normal personalities anyway.

So it all feels as though the story kind of lost interest in the whole Black Vortex thing about two thirds of the way through, or simply didn’t have a pay-off for it and transitioned into the amber stuff instead.  And sure, Kitty phasing a planet free from amber is a nice visual, but the whole thing wraps up with epilogues setting up for sequels, and Kitty giving us a monologue about how Earth is in space too.  Since when was this story about the artificiality of the distinction between home and abroad?

At thirteen issues – longer than the entire run of one of the participating titles – this is far too long.  It’s really a Star-Lord arc that needed some guest stars in order to have people to power up, and certainly the finale is all about Peter and Kitty.  For the rest of us, there are a couple of vaguely interesting ideas in here, but a lot of repetitive corridor-running to kill time, building to a final third that’s pretty disconnected from the first two.  While it’s more coherent than crossovers of its scale tend to be, you’d struggle to say it managed to tell a satisfying story that rewards its sprawl.

Bring on the comments

  1. I’ve been liking Avengers more than some of the people here, it seems. Hickman definitely has a tendency towards putting plot before characters (something that’s often said about sci-fi in general–I mention that not to get him off the hook, but because I was recently in a sci-fi literature course, and by God, I’m going to get my money’s worth). But there have been some character beats that I appreciated:
    –Hyperion bonding with Thor
    –Sunspot’s mix of heart and cocky naivety (makes an interesting contrast with Iron Man)
    –Namor getting taken down a peg
    –Natasha and Jessica tracking down Tony and abandoning him.

    The story’s had some big problems: the glacial plotting, a tendency towards the long game that ignores doing something in the here and now, and gender stuff (I hope you liked the Natasha/Jessica scene, ’cause that’s about the only time an established female Avenger will do something significant in this book.). But there’s also been a lot that’s kept me reading.
    I’m not totally sure Hickman can stick the landing, but, well, we’ll see.

  2. The original Matt says:

    I’ve been loving the Hickman Avengers. Yes, it’s plot before characters, but I happen to like the plot, so that’s no issue for me.

    I’m not hugely familiar with old Avengers, though. I was always an X-men reader and the Avengers were just the other super heroes who existed in the same universe. Is there a “Claremont” equivalent in Avengers history? (By this I mean a particular run which defined the property in some way)

  3. wwk5d says:

    I think you will get varied answers on that. Some might say the Thomas/Buscema era, others Busiek, some might say Stern/Buscema or the Englehart era.

    For me, one of my favorite runs is from vol. 1, from around the 140s to # 200. Lots of classic stories and characters from era. Different writers, but most of the art is done by George Perez and John Byrne, and still looks really good today.

    You might want to check out the Korvac Saga from that era, it’s somewhat close to long-range cosmic style of Hickman’s Avengers (though not on that scale).

  4. Chris says:

    Yeah, I was going to say, before the question was asked.

    The quintessential Avengers writers were probably Roger Stern… and then Kurt Busiek, who did his best to have his Avengers call back to the tone the late 1970s Avengers….

    And even back then there are a lot of quality writers including Jim Shooter.

    But wwk5d is right.

  5. Chris says:

    Mind you my other problem with Hickman is that past writers’ Avengers stories, even Bendis long may he rot, have included an element of hope, and the Avengers bringing hope.

    This is 77 issues of the Avengers failing, badly, and continually.

    With little spikes of checks being marked off.

    Also good guys being treated like bad guys for destroying an uninhabited earth but bad guys that go about torturing people before their earth-killing are running around unchecked.

    Never mind that Thanos is Namor’s henchdude because Namor blew up 6 billion Egyptians? This “The Cabal” is basically not a group of the most fitting characters but the villains that Hickman has been playing with minus Dr Doom.

    I thought it was cool that Hickman was carrying subplot from the last book that he wrote to the next one and the one after that, from Secret Warriors to SHIELD to Fantastic Four to Avengers etc…. because Englehart kind of did it too, even from Avengers to Justice League of America and back to the Avengers.

    He also tied up dreck from the Millar run of Fantastic Four, and I hated that run. Dwayne McDuffie was better and under-appreciated. He also tied off some great ideas from DnA in ways that I didn’t like.

    I used to think that it worked pretty well, even when the choices weren’t that good.

    But the subplots are basically spiraling to a singularity of characters being hopeless and helpless, I’m not excited to shell out the cash to see how the tale ends.

  6. errant says:

    @Jerry Ray — ” What’s the hook of the Justice League?”

    Yes, exactly. Except with the Justice League, those are some of the most iconic characters in all of popular culture. The Avengers on the other hand, from their inception until about 10 years ago were supposed to be Marvel’s answer, except starring a bunch of characters nobody gave a shit about.

    The only reason Marvel is even able to hype them and produce movies with them is because there was so little interest in any of them that all of the licensing deals expired and reverted back to Marvel.

    It’s no coincidence that the X-Men, Spider-man and FF are the 3 properties Marvel can’t get the rights back to. Because they have interesting characters and narrative purposes.

    I commend them for turning nothing into something, but it’s even more of an accomplishment because the Avengers are literally nothing.

  7. Jerry Ray says:

    Errant, you’ve chosen your name well – you’re way off base. 🙂

    When the Avengers started, and through most of their first few decades, they WERE among Marvel’s iconic characters. Not as widespread as Superman/Batman/Wonder Woman, but those characters had a 30 year head start. Spidey and the FF were equally big among comics fans, but not any more known than the Avengers in the wider world. (Heck, Iron Man/Hulk/Cap/Thor/Namor had their own cartoon series in the 60s – that’s something.) The X-Men were C-list also-rans until well into the Claremont run. There’s ebb and flow in the popularity and recognizability of all these characters, and it doesn’t have much to do with their “hook.”

  8. errant says:

    The “hook” has a lot to do with the relatable stories one can tell, which is what we’re talking about. Again, what is an “Avengers story” other than some famous dudes get together to beat shit up.

  9. Chris says:

    That’s not an Avengers story…

  10. Chris says:

    First, the original high concept of the Avengers comic lines up with the orginal high concept of the JLA because one was stolen from the other. Explicitly.

    The big icons of the respective company teaming up to fight evil.

    The Avengers have had periods where it was not that, but it is that right now.

    But that “hook”, that high concept, is not what makes something an Avengers story.

    Frankly the Defenders are also made up of four of Marvel’s most powerful, even if not the best selling. But a Defenders story is still a particular thing.

    What was my point? Right.

    What makes a story an Avengers story that certainly is not what Jonathan Hickman has?

    More camaraderie would be a start….

  11. Taibak says:

    Avengers may have started out as a team made of Marvel’s best characters, but I’m not sure that’s actually relevant. I’m not sure Spider-Man and Wolverine really belong there any more than Mr. Fantastic and the Invisible Woman did 30 years ago. Captain America, Thor, and Iron Man have been mainstays, but so weren’t the Wasp, Hawkeye, and the Vision.

  12. Chris says:

    Whatever.

    I was just making a historical point.

    The Ditko characters and the FF weren’t Avengers for two different reasons.

    However…

  13. Chris says:

    Taibak, I’m not dismissing your point because you’re wrong or irrelevant….. or to be offensive.

    It’s just that you’re addressing my digression and not my point.

  14. Jamie says:

    Bob Harras did some good stuff on Avengers before all the Crossing shite. I still consider Hickman’s Infinity to be Operation: Galactic Storm done wrong.

  15. Taibak says:

    Chris: Looking back at what you wrote, it sounds like we agree, actually. To me, as an outsider, the Avengers are about Avengers characters doing classic superhero stories.

  16. Chris says:

    Infinity is exactly like Operation: Galactic Storm except that OGS was about relationships and characters with the backdrop of frikkin interstellar war…. while Infinity didn’t respect continuity well enough to have relationships and just ended up being an overlong excuse to create new mutants, I mean “Inhumans”

    so Jamie is exactly right.

    as is Taibak

Leave a Reply